Back to search

Article

What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocol

2021-11-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence synthesis in which components of the systematic review process may be simplified or omitted to produce information more efficiently within constraints o...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
78527c18-0434-57bb-9750-5af4be605290
DOI
10.12688/hrbopenres.13321.2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
What are the most important unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology? A James Lind Alliance research methodology Priority Setting Partnership: the Priority III study protocolDOI 10.12688/hrbopenres.13321.2
Annotations to Structure a Systematic Review: Methodological Update and Key Principles Using the S0–S3 FlowSemantic proximity
Involving the public in research prioritisation and as research partners in the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (2021-23): processes, research priorities, outputs, and lessonsSemantic proximity
Mapping Methodology to Identify Research Gaps and Priorities in Existing Scoping Reviews - A Scoping ReviewSemantic proximity
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsSemantic proximity
The pragmatic, rapid, and iterative dissemination &amp; implementation (PRIDI) cycle: Adapting to the dynamic nature of public health emergenciesSemantic proximity
(Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review protocolSemantic proximity
Characteristics of Registered Systematic Reviews on Treatment for COVID-19 in Prospero PlatformSemantic proximity
Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in SwedenSemantic proximity
Protocol for an eDelphi study to identify consensus on policy metrics which should be included in future assessments of the England Rare Diseases Action PlansSemantic proximity
The readiness of the Asian research ethics committees in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country surveySemantic proximity
Assessing the Secondary Use and Scientific Impact of Shared Clinical Trial Data: A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Trials Shared on the YODA Project PlatformSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.