Back to search

Article

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Upadacitinib Versus Abatacept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 12-Week Results of a Phase 3 Trial

2021-08-09

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background</bold> In previous clinical trials, patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with upadacitinib (UPA) have improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis of SELECT-CHOICE, a phase 3, double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluated the impact of UPA vs abatacept (ABA) with background conventional synthetic disease-modify...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
809b993b-a382-562c-915d-9533e4ec067f
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-734225/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Upadacitinib Versus Abatacept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 12-Week Results of a Phase 3 TrialDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-734225/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.