Back to search

Article

A 22-Point Matrisome Profiling Standard Exposes the Gap between Marketing Claims and Biological Evidence in Aesthetic Medicine

2026-08-12

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background The terms “regeneration” and “rejuvenation” in aesthetic medicine are used without standardized evidentiary criteria. This review quantified the gap between regenerative claims and biological evidence. Methods A PROSPERO-registered living systematic review (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science; January 2001 to June 2026) applied the Matrisome Profiling Standard (MPS) a 22-point f...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3501ce4d-f976-5229-bfd0-85e14da3aa7a
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10657480/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A 22-Point Matrisome Profiling Standard Exposes the Gap between Marketing Claims and Biological Evidence in Aesthetic MedicineDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10657480/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.