Back to search

Article

Benchmarking eye health advice from generative artificial intelligence in terms of factual accuracy, safety, comprehensiveness and readability

2026-04-21

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) chatbots are increasingly used for health advice despite lacking regulatory approval, raising concerns about their output quality and safety. This study assesses eye health advice from leading genAI platforms, benchmarking their quality against patient information leaflets. Methods We compared outputs from GPT-5 (OpenAI) and Gemini...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
29c2a6a4-3dd2-56bb-8d87-3fbabb984d92
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-9383173/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Benchmarking eye health advice from generative artificial intelligence in terms of factual accuracy, safety, comprehensiveness and readabilityDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9383173/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.