Article

Expert evaluation and readability of conversational AI responses to common ophthalmic patient questions: an exploratory generational cross-sectional study

2026-04-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Purpose: To evaluate expert-rated informational quality and linguistic accessibility of responses generated by a contemporary large language model to common ophthalmic patient questions, and to explore generational evolution in conversational artificial intelligence (AI) performance. <h4>Methods:</h4> In this cross-sectional exploratory study, 12 frequently asked ophthalmology question...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: f6145194-778f-5fcf-ac09-61c68c8421ad
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9242640/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Expert evaluation and readability of conversational AI responses to common ophthalmic patient questions: an exploratory generational cross-sectional studyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9242640/v1Read

Large Language Models as Ophthalmic Patient Educators: A Comparative Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and ActionabilitySemantic proximity Read

Benchmarking eye health advice from generative artificial intelligence in terms of factual accuracy, safety, comprehensiveness and readabilitySemantic proximity Read

Exploring the Role of ChatGPT-4, BingAI, and Gemini as Virtual Consultants to Educate Families about Retinopathy of PrematuritySemantic proximity Read

ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0: A Head to Head Comparison in Generating Pharyngitis Patient GuidesSemantic proximity Read

Assessing Large Language Model Utility and Limitations in Diabetes Education: A Cross-Sectional Study of Patient Interactions and Specialist EvaluationsSemantic proximity Read

Assessing ChatGPT's Performance in Delineating Uveitis: An analysis of responses to real-world case presentationsSemantic proximity Read

Reliability and Clinical Accuracy of ChatGPT in Post-FESS Counselling: A Multi-Reviewer Evaluation.Semantic proximity Read

Patient-centered Evaluation of AI Answers to Genetic Counseling QuestionsSemantic proximity Read

Physician Evaluations of Large Language Model-Generated Responses to Medical Questions by Region and Years in Practice: A preliminary studySemantic proximity Read

User evaluations of AI- and human-generated responses in digital health communication: A paired survey studySemantic proximity Read

Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology: An Analysis of its Successes and ShortcomingsSemantic proximity Read

Enhancing Patient Education With AI:A Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Versus American Academy of Ophthalmology Online Patient Education MaterialsSemantic proximity Read