Back to search

Article

How does generative artificial intelligence compare to human analysts in qualitative research?: A systematic review of large language models

2025-12-13

Abstract excerpt

<p>Introduction: Qualitative methods offer rich insights into human experience, yet the expanding volume of textual data presents analytic challenges. Generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), may help researchers organize and interpret qualitative data while maintaining depth and accuracy. It is important to assess the validity and practical suitability of LLMs for qualitative analysis. This syste...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
27dd662f-7b3e-5c4e-a80b-41b2af365d24
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/gnx8p_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How does generative artificial intelligence compare to human analysts in qualitative research?: A systematic review of large language modelsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/gnx8p_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.