Back to search

Article

Human vs. Machine: A Comparative Analysis of Qualitative Coding by Humans and ChatGPT-4

2025-09-14

Abstract excerpt

<p>Generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications are becoming increasingly influential in psychology training, practice, and research. In this study, the procedures (e.g., coding process) and products (e.g., codes; themes; core story) of qualitative content analysis (QCA) conducted by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4 and novice human researchers were compared, and advantages and disadvant...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1d133e8b-b945-516e-a59c-2bbb313ee307
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/8g36r
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Human vs. Machine: A Comparative Analysis of Qualitative Coding by Humans and ChatGPT-4DOI 10.31234/osf.io/8g36r
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.