Back to search

Article

The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence (2023-2026)

2026-05-19

Abstract excerpt

This paper examines the empirical evidence on the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in scientific writing. A search was conducted in Google Scholar and PubMed, followed by an analysis of the included studies, which was performed according to the academic field, AI tool, writing task, study design, and main findings. Following the PRISMA guide, this scoping review included 18 studies published betwe...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
91d1a40d-2d7f-5d5c-b026-143b9d18a1e2
DOI
10.20944/preprints202605.1200.v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence (2023-2026)DOI 10.20944/preprints202605.1200.v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.