Back to search

Article

Method Choice, Not Biology, Determines In Silico Perturbation Results: A Systematic Evaluation of Eight Methods Across Four Datasets

2026-08-19

Abstract excerpt

Most in silico perturbation methods for single-cell transcriptomics have been validated only on individual datasets, leaving their reliability and generalizability unknown. Through systematic cross-method, cross-dataset benchmarking of eight methods spanning six mathematical frameworks across four datasets, we find that six of eight methods—including widely used VAE-based and tensor decomposition approaches—fail t...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
278be97b-f840-5c13-b321-5d993d2b44e2
DOI
10.64898/2026.08.11.744106
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Method Choice, Not Biology, Determines In Silico Perturbation Results: A Systematic Evaluation of Eight Methods Across Four DatasetsDOI 10.64898/2026.08.11.744106
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.