Article

Drivers of Oncologist Preference of AI-Generated Literature Review in a Randomized Mixed-Methods Study

2026-08-27

Abstract excerpt

Doctors increasingly rely on AI in the clinic, yet which report features make AI-generated responses useful and trustworthy remains unclear. In this randomized mixed-methods study, 34 oncology physicians provided 294 ratings of four blinded AI systems across five vignettes, alongside 20 semi-structured interviews analyzed with a prespecified LLM-assisted qualitative pipeline. Despite similar references, an evidenc...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 1caf7bbe-74be-53ed-8da3-68b360c70559
DOI: 10.64898/2026.08.24.26361252

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Drivers of Oncologist Preference of AI-Generated Literature Review in a Randomized Mixed-Methods StudyDOI 10.64898/2026.08.24.26361252Read

Atomic Fact-Checking Increases Clinician Trust in Large Language Model Recommendations for Oncology Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read

Can AI Match Human Experts? Evaluating LLM-Generated Feedback on Resident Scholarly ProjectsSemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence in Systematic Reviews: Overcoming Reproducibility, Bias and Validation ChallengesSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating Loon Lens Pro™, an AI-Driven Tool for Full-Text Screening in Systematic Reviews: A Validation StudySemantic proximity Read

Agentic AI for Streamlining Title and Abstract Screening: Addressing Precision and evaluating calibration of AI guardrailsSemantic proximity Read

Quality, consistency, and clinical safety of AI-generated versus clinician-written clinical notes: a multi-country paired simulation studySemantic proximity Read

Fully Automated Systematic Review Generation via Large Language Models: Quality Assessment and Implications for Scientific PublishingSemantic proximity Read

Rater choice determines measured fidelity: a multi-model evaluation of large language model raters for AI-generated plain-language biomedical summariesSemantic proximity Read

A Meta-Research Framework for Transparent, Ethically Accountable Integration of CAMSemantic proximity Read

Will generative AI help solve systematic literature reviews? Evidence from a 2-year research programmeSemantic proximity Read

How far can AI help with assessing the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications? Review of concepts, methods, and questions.Semantic proximity Read

Comparison of AI-Generated Radiology Impressions: A Multi-Stakeholder EvaluationSemantic proximity Read