Back to search

Article

Quality, consistency, and clinical safety of AI-generated versus clinician-written clinical notes: a multi-country paired simulation study

2026-08-21

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> Ambient AI documentation tools, known as scribes, are entering routine clinical practice at scale, but the evidence comparing the notes they produce against clinician-written notes is dominated by single-site, single-language studies that rely on human review to find errors, a method known to miss most documentation errors. Methods We conducted a paired simulation across five countries and l...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
902551c0-2fd8-5379-bcd9-2de9ad8cae1d
DOI
10.64898/2026.08.18.26360701
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Quality, consistency, and clinical safety of AI-generated versus clinician-written clinical notes: a multi-country paired simulation studyDOI 10.64898/2026.08.18.26360701
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.