Article

Improving the questions we ask, with Psychology and Cognitive Conflict.

2018-07-16

Abstract excerpt

<p>Over the last decade, there have been many suggestions to improve how scientists answer their questions, but far fewer attempt to improve the questions scientists are asking in the first place. The goal of the paper is then to examine and summarize synthesize the evidence on how to ask the best questions possible. First is a brief review of the philosophical and empirical literature on how the best science is d...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 0439ca54-9a04-53d8-9177-3fc068585e4b
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/g258f

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Improving the questions we ask, with Psychology and Cognitive Conflict.DOI 10.31234/osf.io/g258fRead

Uncertainty in Psychology Research Articles: The Evolution of Its Frequency Between 2005 and 2020Semantic proximity Read

Learning with Certainty in ChildhoodSemantic proximity Read

A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondSemantic proximity Read

Cohen’s Convention, the Seriousness of Errors, and the Body of Knowledge in Behavioral ScienceSemantic proximity Read

Do people use counterexamples or subjective probabilities in uncertain conditional reasoning? Investigating human reasoning with an open response formatSemantic proximity Read

Addressing climate change skepticism and inaction using human-AI dialoguesSemantic proximity Read

What could go wrong: Adults and children calibrate their predictions and explanations of others' actions based on relative reward and dangerSemantic proximity Read

Synergy Between the Credibility Revolution and Human Development in AfricaSemantic proximity Read

Dialogues with Large Language Models reduce conspiracy beliefs even when the AI is perceived as humanSemantic proximity Read