Back to search

Article

Dialogues with Large Language Models reduce conspiracy beliefs even when the AI is perceived as human

2025-09-29

Abstract excerpt

<p>Although conspiracy beliefs are often viewed as resistant to correction, recent evidence shows that personalized, fact-based dialogues with artificial intelligence (AI) can reduce them. Is this effect driven by the debunking facts and evidence, or does it rely on the messenger being an AI model? In other words, would the same message be equally effective if delivered by a human? To answer this question, we cond...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
132f7f8f-b71f-5deb-b0aa-27f6b36fa95c
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/apmb5_v4
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Dialogues with Large Language Models reduce conspiracy beliefs even when the AI is perceived as humanDOI 10.31234/osf.io/apmb5_v4
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.