What could go wrong: Adults and children calibrate their predictions and explanations of others' actions based on relative reward and danger

Abstract excerpt

<p>When human adults make decisions (e.g. wearing a seat-belt), we often consider the negative consequences that would ensue if our actions were to fail, even if we have never experienced such a failure. Do the same considerations guide our understanding of other people’s decisions? In this paper, we investigated whether adults, who have many years of experience making such decisions, and 6- and 7-year-old childre...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

• Artificial Intelligence
• Cooperative Behavior
• Game Theory
• Models, Biological
• Mutation
• Phenotype
• Population Dynamics
• Social Behavior

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work

8221bd49-5351-5d8c-8e7c-e834d9e9bedf

DOI

10.31234/osf.io/2bwa5