Back to search

Article

Do people use counterexamples or subjective probabilities in uncertain conditional reasoning? Investigating human reasoning with an open response format

2024-07-31

Abstract excerpt

<p>Probabilistic approaches to human reasoning argue that all reasoning processes are inherently probabilistic and based on degrees of belief. To show this, participants are typically presented with scaled response formats, in which they can indicate how strongly they belief in a conclusion. However, the cognitive mechanisms behind uncertain reasoning remain unclear. How do people assess degrees of belief? This pa...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d849af0f-d585-5896-9dea-386df6bafa79
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/y9tva
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Do people use counterexamples or subjective probabilities in uncertain conditional reasoning? Investigating human reasoning with an open response formatDOI 10.31234/osf.io/y9tva
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.