Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study.

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine - 4 Jan 2025

Badr Hoda, Byun Jinyoung, Aldrich Melinda C, Bierut Laura J, Chen Li-Shiun, Hung Rayjean J, Amos Christopher I

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) hold promise for early lung cancer detection and personalized treatment, yet factors influencing patient interest in PRS-based genetic testing are not well understood. PURPOSE: Grounded in the health belief model, this mixed-methods study explored knowledge, attitudes, perceived benefits and barriers to lung cancer PRS, and preferences for receiving PRS results. RESULTS:...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Black or African American

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Lung Neoplasms

Share to Multifactorial Inheritance

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 40261086
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaf020
PMCID: PMC12012679

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study.PMID 40261086Read ↗

Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of health professionals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Knowledge, Interest and Recommendations for Receipt of Polygenetic Risk Scores Among Adults Who Smoked Long-Term: A Descriptive Qualitative Analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of patients with cancer about personalized medicine and somatic genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward polygenic risk scores for breast cancer in multiethnic high-risk cohorts of women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scoresSemantic proximity Read ↗

Knowledge, Attitudes and Demand Toward Cardiovascular Polygenic Risk Testing in Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey of PatientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Uptake of polygenic risk information among women at increased risk of breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Stakeholder Experiences and Perspectives on Integrating Polygenic Breast Cancer Risk Scores into Swedish Clinical PracticeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Validation of the <i>Vanderbilt PRS-KS</i> , an Instrument to Quantify Polygenic Risk Score KnowledgeSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.