Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparative study of Rapid DNA versus conventional methods on compromised bones.

Forensic science international. Genetics - 1 Mar 2023

Date Chong Mavis, Sheehan Sandra, Battaglia Jessica, Wescott Daniel J, Wallin Jeanette

Abstract excerpt

Equivalent amounts of compromised bones were used to directly compare STR success of conventional and Rapid DNA methods. Conventional DNA extraction methods, including manual full demineralization and semi-automated PrepFiler BTA/ AutoMate Express (ThermoFisher Scientific), provided insights regarding the DNA quantity and extent of degradation of each compromised bone analyzed with ANDE 6C (ANDE Corp) and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alleles
Share to Bone and Bones
Share to DNA

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to DNA Fingerprinting

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36592573
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102825

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparative study of Rapid DNA versus conventional methods on compromised bones.PMID 36592573Read ↗

The effects of extra PCR cycles when amplifying skeletal samples with the GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of a modified amplification approach for improved STR recovery from severely degraded skeletal elements.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods Developed for Forensic and Ancient DNA Applications Using Bone Samples of Different Age.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimized DNA extraction to improve reproducibility of short tandem repeat genotyping with highly degraded DNA as target.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of bone grinding on the quantity and quality of DNA obtained from aged trabecular bones.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[A reviewing for profiling of highly degraded remains].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Two simplified tooth sample preparation methods for conventional laboratory and RapidHIT™ ID workflows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of modified Yfiler amplification strategy for compromised samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effectiveness of whole genome amplification prior to short tandem repeat analysis for degraded DNA.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative sensitivity and inhibitor tolerance of GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification and Investigator® 24plex QS kits for challenging samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[PrepFiler Express BTATM Lysis Buffer Combined with Silicon Microbeads for Rapid DNA Extraction from Bone].Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of an enzymatic bone processing method on short tandem repeat profiling of challenged bone specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.