Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Physics Essentials Enable Deeper Understanding in Signaling and Crosstalk of the Carcinogenesis Paradigm "Epistemology of the Origin of Cancer".

Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology - 30 Sept 2022

Brücher Björn L D M, Daumer Martin, Jamall Ijaz S

Abstract excerpt

Radioactivity and radiation-induced mutations are believed to be primary causal examples of cancer-initiating events (stimulus). The assumption that an increase in cancer risk develops from any amount of radiation gave rise to the linear no-threshold model. This also led to the assumption that cancer is caused by somatic mutations as described by the somatic mutation theory. Against this backdrop, in actuality...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Carcinogenesis
Share to Mutation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Neoplasms

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36177655
DOI: 10.33594/000000575

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Physics Essentials Enable Deeper Understanding in Signaling and Crosstalk of the Carcinogenesis Paradigm "Epistemology of the Origin of Cancer".PMID 36177655Read ↗

Somatic Mutation Theory - Why it's Wrong for Most Cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Real world in cancer? Epistemology of the origin of cancer: new paradigm for the majority of cancersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding the biology and advent of physics of cancer with perspicacity in current treatment therapySemantic proximity Read ↗

What does physics have to do with cancer?Semantic proximity Read ↗

From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding mechanisms of cancer initiation and development supports the need for an implementation of primary and secondary cancer prevention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer-Associated Mutations but No Cancer: Insights into the Early Steps of Carcinogenesis and Implications for Early Cancer DetectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Correction: Somatic mutations in cancer developmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: why it should be dropped and replaced.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular theory of cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The strength of organ, tissue, and body field effects determines the frequency of all neoplasia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.