Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification

30 Apr 2021

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Has cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) improved over time and which factors are associated with such an improvement? SUMMARY ANSWER: During an 11-year period, 2007-2017, CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly, from 27.0% to 36.3%, in parallel with an increase in blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation by vitrification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: While it has been shown that live birth rate...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34195386
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab021

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationPMID 34195386Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged >40 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility programSemantic proximity Read ↗

Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGTSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates of 31 478 untested embryos from 11 463 women challenge traditional recurrent implantation failure definitionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.