Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilization

1 May 2019

Abstract excerpt

Traditionally, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates have been reported in terms of live birth per fresh cycle or embryo transfer. However, reporting IVF outcomes using cumulative live birth rates (LBR), defined as the first live birth following the use of all fresh and frozen embryos derived from a single ovarian stimulation cycle appears to be a better measure of IVF treatment success. Although there is an...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30486636
DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.18.04347-2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilizationPMID 30486636Read ↗

Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fertilization rate as a novel indicator for cumulative live birth rate: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 9,394 complete in vitro fertilization cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative Live-Birth Rates after In Vitro FertilizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates of 31 478 untested embryos from 11 463 women challenge traditional recurrent implantation failure definitionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth ratesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility programSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.