Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle

12 Sept 2016

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Do cumulative live birth rates differ between single cleavage-stage Day 3 transfer and single blastocyst-stage Day 5 transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative live birth rates after Day 3 and 5 transfers were similar in young patients when the vitrified embryo transfers were also taken into account. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous evidence has shown that the probability of live birth following IVF with...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27619768
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew219

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cyclePMID 27619768Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst TransferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Perinatal outcomes in singleton live births after fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 67 147 IVF/ICSI cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGTSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Single and double embryo transfer provide similar live birth rates in frozen cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryosSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.