Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study

1 Jan 2022

Abstract excerpt

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte collection cycle (OCC) comparable after cleavage-stage or blastocyst-stage transfer in combination with supernumerary blastocyst vitrification on Day 5 (D5) in patients with four or fewer zygotes on Day 1? SUMMARY ANSWER The CLBR in a fresh blastocyst-transfer or cleavage-stage transfer policy followed by vitrification on D5 is comparable...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 35919767
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac031

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 23 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studyPMID 35919767Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Outcomes for Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer of Day 5 and Day 6 With Different Quality: a Large Matched-cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged >40 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation programSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parameters impacting the live birth rate per transfer after frozen single euploid blastocyst transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.