Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Executable cancer models: successes and challenges.

Nature reviews. Cancer - 1 Jun 2020

Clarke Matthew A, Fisher Jasmin

Abstract excerpt

Making decisions on how best to treat cancer patients requires the integration of different data sets, including genomic profiles, tumour histopathology, radiological images, proteomic analysis and more. This wealth of biological information calls for novel strategies to integrate such information in a meaningful, predictive and experimentally verifiable way. In this Perspective we explain how executable...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antineoplastic Agents
Share to Clinical Trials as Topic
Share to Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic

Share to Interdisciplinary Communication

Share to Molecular Targeted Therapy

Share to Precision Medicine

Share to Tumor Cells, Cultured

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32341552
DOI: 10.1038/s41568-020-0258-x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Executable cancer models: successes and challenges.PMID 32341552Read ↗

Biologically based cancer modeling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Creation of MLPA: A Multi-level Digital Twin Framework for Personalized Cancer Simulation and Treatment OptimizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Modelling in tumour biology part 1: modelling concepts and structures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissuesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient-specific computational models predict prognosis in B cell lymphoma by quantifying pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic signatures from genetic sequencing dataSemantic proximity Read ↗

Probabilistic modeling of personalized drug combinations from integrated chemical screen and molecular data in sarcomaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Inferring Tumor Progression in Large DatasetsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient-specific computational models predict prognosis in B cell lymphoma by quantifying pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic signatures from genetic sequencing data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

PMCE: efficient inference of expressive models of cancer evolution with high prognostic powerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Integrating model systems and genomic insights to decipher mechanisms of cancer metastasisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the transcriptional fidelity of cancer modelsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Navigating Multi-scale Cancer Systems Biology towards Model-driven Personalized TherapeuticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.