Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) - 1 Mar 2020

Daly Mary B

Abstract excerpt

The Risk Assessment Program (RAP) at Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA) is a multi-generational prospective cohort, enhanced for personal and family history of cancer, consisting of over 10,000 individuals for whom data on personal and family history of cancer, risk factors, genetic and genomic data, health behaviors, and biospecimens are available. The RAP has a broad research agenda including the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Consensus
Share to Decision Making
Share to Disclosure

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene-Environment Interaction

Share to Information Dissemination

Share to Medical History Taking

Share to Registries

Share to Risk Assessment

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 32132115
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0267
PMCID: PMC7080295

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.PMID 32132115Read ↗

Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New NormalSemantic proximity Read ↗

At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Survey of Patients’ Experiences with the Cancer Genetic Counseling Process: Recommendations for Cancer Genetics ProgramsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of genome-informed risk-assessment results for common conditions to 23,840 adults and children: An eMERGE network study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Healthcare professionals' experiences returning monogenic, polygenic, and integrated risk results in the eMERGE study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of secondary genomic findings vs patient autonomy: implications for medical care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.