Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Direct Versus Calculated LDL Cholesterol and C-Reactive Protein in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in the Framingham Offspring Study

25 Jun 2019

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Increases in circulating LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentrations are significant risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We assessed direct LDL-C and hsCRP concentrations compared to standard risk factors in the Framingham Offspring Study. METHODS: We used stored frozen plasma samples (-80 °C) obtained after an overnight fast from 3147 male and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Share to Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Share to Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 31239251
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.304600

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Direct Versus Calculated LDL Cholesterol and C-Reactive Protein in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in the Framingham Offspring StudyPMID 31239251Read ↗

Is Isolated Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol a Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor? New Insights From the Framingham Offspring Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SdLDL‑C/LDL‑C discordance as a practical surrogate for triglyceride‑associated cardiovascular risk: identification of at‑risk lipid phenotypes in the CHARLS prospective cohort.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unmasking residual cardiovascular risk: The paradoxical interaction between remnant cholesterol and calculated LDL-C in a high-risk cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

A genetic risk score based on direct associations with coronary heart disease improves coronary heart disease risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), but not in the Rotterdam and Framingham Offspring, Studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sex-specific differences in the predictive value of cholesterol homeostasis markers and 10-year cardiovascular disease event rate in Framingham Offspring Study participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Usefulness of the Triglyceride–High-Density Lipoprotein Versus the Cholesterol–High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio for Predicting Insulin Resistance and Cardiometabolic Risk (from the Framingham Offspring Cohort)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of LDL-C calculated with Martin's formula compared to the Friedewald equation in familial combined hyperlipidemia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation of Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins and Sampson Equations in the Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Estimation with Different AssaysSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of cardiovascular disease among hematopoietic cell transplantation survivorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

C-reactive protein and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in 268 803 East AsiansSemantic proximity Read ↗

Discrimination and net reclassification of cardiovascular risk with lipoprotein(a): prospective 15-year outcomes in the Bruneck Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differences in Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Subclinical Vascular Disease Among Black and White Participants in the Cardiovascular Health StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.