Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Classification of factors involved in nonreportable results of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prediction of success rate of second NIPT

26 Dec 2018

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons for nonreportable cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), we retrospectively studied maternal characteristics and other details associated with the results. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in pregnant women undergoing NIPT by massively parallel sequencing (MPS) with failed cfDNA tests was performed between April 2013 and March...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30586157
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5408

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 23 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Classification of factors involved in nonreportable results of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prediction of success rate of second NIPTPMID 30586157Read ↗

The importance of determining the limit of detection of non‐invasive prenatal testing methodsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Overall evaluation of the clinical value of prenatal screening for fetal-free DNA in maternal bloodSemantic proximity Read ↗

The implications of non-invasive prenatal testing failures: a review of an under-discussed phenomenonSemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive Prenatal DNA Testing: The Vanguard of Genomic MedicineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Advances, Applications, and Limitations in Prenatal ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening from a Genetic Counseling Prospective: Pre and Post-Genetic Counseling Regarding Rare Chromosomal Abnormalities and Incidental FindingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future DirectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing when fetal cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> is absentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: for those women screened by NIPT using cell free DNA, maternal serum markers are obsoleteSemantic proximity Read ↗

Noninvasive Prenatal TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.