Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing when fetal cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> is absent

31 Oct 2014

Abstract excerpt

Numerous studies have validated the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to assess the risk of fetal aneuploidies early in pregnancy1, and we have used this technology in our practice since 2012 in both low- and high-risk women2. We are aware that several factors influence the fraction of fetal cfDNA present in maternal blood. Such factors include gestational age and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25358606
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14715

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing when fetal cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> is absentPMID 25358606Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Implications of fetoplacental mosaicism on cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> testing: a review of a common biological phenomenonSemantic proximity Read ↗

PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING: Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy, copy-number variants and single-gene disordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

The importance of determining the limit of detection of non‐invasive prenatal testing methodsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell-based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (cbNIPT)—A Review on the Current Developments and Future ProspectsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US contextSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fetomaternal microchimerism and genetic diagnosis: On the origins of fetal cells and cell-free fetal DNA in the pregnant womanSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recommended pre‐test counseling points for noninvasive prenatal testing using cell‐free DNA: a 2015 perspectiveSemantic proximity Read ↗

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: for those women screened by NIPT using cell free DNA, maternal serum markers are obsoleteSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utilitySemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potentialSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.