Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics

11 Oct 2018

Abstract excerpt

Technological advances have increased the availability of genomic data in research and the clinic. If, over time, interpretation of the significance of the data changes, or new information becomes available, the question arises as to whether recontacting the patient and/or family is indicated. The Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG), together with research...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 30310124
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0285-1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human GeneticsPMID 30310124Read ↗

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting or not recontacting? A survey of current practices in clinical genetics centres in EuropeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Physicians’ Duty to Recontact and Update Genetic AdviceSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Coming Explosion in Genetic Testing — Is There a Duty to Recontact?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recontact to return new or updated PALB2 genetic results in the clinical laboratory setting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What do cancer genetic providers want us to know about variant reclassification and recontact that we are not asking? A thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Referring patients for a medical genetics consultation and genetic counseling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of variant reclassification and patient re-contact in a cancer genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.