Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom

4 Jan 2017

Abstract excerpt

This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28051074
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.188

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United KingdomPMID 28051074Read ↗

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human GeneticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting or not recontacting? A survey of current practices in clinical genetics centres in EuropeSemantic proximity Read ↗

A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Physicians’ Duty to Recontact and Update Genetic AdviceSemantic proximity Read ↗

"Out of the blue": A qualitative study exploring the experiences of women and next of kin receiving unexpected results from BRA-STRAP research gene panel testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant ReclassificationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental experiences of recontacting for extended genetic testing after a terminated pregnancy for congenital malformationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

What do cancer genetic providers want us to know about variant reclassification and recontact that we are not asking? A thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Duty to Recontact: Attitudes of Genetics Service ProvidersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive Genetic Testing of Children for Adult‐Onset Conditions: Negotiating Requests with ParentsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical genetics and its adjacent regimesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.