Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom

18 Feb 2016

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether and how recontacting occurs in the United Kingdom. METHOD: A Web-based survey was administered online between October 2014 and July 2015. A link to the survey was circulated via an e-mail invitation to the clinical leads of the United Kingdom's 23 clinical genetics services, with follow-up with senior clinical genetics staff. RESULTS: The majority of UK services reported that they...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 26890453
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.194

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United KingdomPMID 26890453Read ↗

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human GeneticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recontacting or not recontacting? A survey of current practices in clinical genetics centres in EuropeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Physicians’ Duty to Recontact and Update Genetic AdviceSemantic proximity Read ↗

What do cancer genetic providers want us to know about variant reclassification and recontact that we are not asking? A thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant ReclassificationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

"Out of the blue": A qualitative study exploring the experiences of women and next of kin receiving unexpected results from BRA-STRAP research gene panel testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recontact to return new or updated PALB2 genetic results in the clinical laboratory setting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of variant reclassification and patient re-contact in a cancer genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An audit of clinical service examining the uptake of genetic testing by at-risk family members.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Parental experiences of recontacting for extended genetic testing after a terminated pregnancy for congenital malformationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.