Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The 2014 BCSH criteria and the 2016 WHO criteria for essential thrombocythemia: A comparison in a large-scale cohort.

European journal of haematology - 1 Jun 2018

Ochiai Tomonori, Yasuda Hajime, Araki Marito, Misawa Kyohei, Morishita Soji, Nudejima Mai, Hironaka Yumi, Shirane Shuichi, Edahiro Yoko, Gotoh Akihiko, Ohsaka Akimichi, Komatsu Norio

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: There are currently 2 representative diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythemia (ET), the 2014 British Committee for Standards in Hematology Guidelines (BCSH) criteria and the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. We compare and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 criteria. METHOD: We applied the 2 criteria to 403 patients with thrombocytosis and suspected...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged, 80 and over
Share to Biomarkers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cohort Studies

Share to Myeloproliferative Disorders

Share to Practice Guidelines as Topic

Share to Thrombocythemia, Essential

Share to Thrombocytosis

Share to Young Adult

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 29405428
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13041

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The 2014 BCSH criteria and the 2016 WHO criteria for essential thrombocythemia: A comparison in a large-scale cohort.PMID 29405428Read ↗

The new WHO classification for essential thrombocythemia calls for revision of available evidences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rationale for revision and proposed changes of the WHO diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Essential thrombocythemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Essential Thrombocythemia: One-Center Data in a Changing Disease.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Modification of British Committee for Standards in Haematology diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythaemiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Update from the latest WHO classification of MPNs: a user's manual.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prodromal myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 WHO classification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Austrian recommendations for the management of essential thrombocythemia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.