Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Feb 2012

Mulder H A, Calus M P L, Druet T, Schrooten C

Abstract excerpt

Genomic selection using 50,000 single nucleotide polymorphism (50k SNP) chips has been implemented in many dairy cattle breeding programs. Cheap, low-density chips make genotyping of a larger number of animals cost effective. A commonly proposed strategy is to impute low-density genotypes up to 50,000 genotypes before predicting direct genomic values (DGV). The objectives of this study were to investigate the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Haplotypes

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22281352
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4490

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.PMID 22281352Read ↗

Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Imputation performances of 3 low-density marker panels in beef and dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Design of a bovine low-density SNP array optimized for imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.