Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology - 1 Jun 2016

Beste Christian, Stock Ann-Kathrin, Epplen Jörg T, Arning Larissa

Abstract excerpt

Action control is achieved through a multitude of cognitive processes. One of them is the ability to inhibit responses, for which the dopaminergic systems is known to play an important role. Many lines of psychophysiological research substantiate that two distinct response inhibition subprocesses exist, but it has remained elusive whether they can be attributed to distinct neurobiological factors governing the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Electroencephalography
Share to Electrophysiological Phenomena

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Inhibition, Psychological

Share to Polymorphism, Genetic

Share to Psychomotor Performance

Share to Receptors, Dopamine D1

Share to Receptors, Dopamine D2

Share to Young Adult

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27021648
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.03.002

Genes

DRD1
DRD2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors.PMID 27021648Read ↗

Paradoxical association of the brain-derived-neurotrophic-factor val66met genotype with response inhibition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Are electrophysiological correlates of response inhibition linked to impulsivity and compulsivity? A machine-learning analysis of a Go/Nogo taskSemantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase and dopamine D4 receptor genotypes on neurophysiological markers of performance monitoring.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dissociable influences of NR2B-receptor related neural transmission on functions of distinct associative basal ganglia circuits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DRD1 and DRD2 genotypes modulate processing modes of goal activation processes during action cascading.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Measurement of the response inhibition network in a brief battery of tasks: Introducing an assessment of reactive and proactive inhibition processes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dopamine transporter genotype predicts behavioural and neural measures of response inhibition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Opposite effects of DRD2 gene polymorphisms on inhibitory control and motor output in antisaccade task in healthy subjects and schizophrenia patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Haplotype polymorphism in the alpha-2B-adrenergic receptor gene influences response inhibition in a large Chinese sample.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the relevance of the NPY2-receptor variation for modes of action cascading processes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of SLC6A3 and COMT variation on neural activation during response inhibition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.