Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.

Genetics - 1 Jun 2015

Legarra Andres, Christensen Ole F, Vitezica Zulma G, Aguilar Ignacio, Misztal Ignacy

Abstract excerpt

Recent use of genomic (marker-based) relationships shows that relationships exist within and across base population (breeds or lines). However, current treatment of pedigree relationships is unable to consider relationships within or across base populations, although such relationships must exist due to finite size of the ancestral population and connections between populations. This complicates the conciliation...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Algorithms
Share to Crosses, Genetic
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetics, Population

Share to Genomics

Share to Inbreeding

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Pedigree

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 25873631
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.177014
PMCID: PMC4492372

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.PMID 25873631Read ↗

Redefining and interpreting genomic relationships of metafounders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating genomic relationships of metafounders across and within breeds using maximum likelihood, pseudo-expectation-maximization maximum likelihood and increase of relationships.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficient genome ancestry inference in complex pedigrees with inbreeding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity and joint-pedigree analysis of two importing Holstein populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Nonparallel genome changes within subpopulations over time contributed to genetic diversity within the US Holstein population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic structure and connectivity analysis in a large domestic livestock meta-population: The case of the Pura Raza Español horses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing estimates of genetic variance across different relationship models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Historical pedigree reconstruction from extant populations using PArtitioning of RElatives (PREPARE).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differences between genomic-based and pedigree-based relationships in a chicken population, as a function of quality control and pedigree links among individuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.