Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Differences between genomic-based and pedigree-based relationships in a chicken population, as a function of quality control and pedigree links among individuals.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Dec 2014

Wang H, Misztal I, Legarra A

Abstract excerpt

This work studied differences between expected (calculated from pedigree) and realized (genomic, from markers) relationships in a real population, the influence of quality control on these differences, and their fit to current theory. Data included 4940 pure line chickens across five generations genotyped for 57,636 SNP. Pedigrees (5762 animals) were available for the five generations, pedigree starting on the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Chickens

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Markers

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Pedigree

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Quality Control

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25039816
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12109

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Differences between genomic-based and pedigree-based relationships in a chicken population, as a function of quality control and pedigree links among individuals.PMID 25039816Read ↗

Pedigree reconstruction based on genotype data in chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use and optimization of different sources of information for genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic estimates of Identity-By-Descent relationships in large scale data sets.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the utility of diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix as a diagnostic tool to detect mislabelled genotyped animals in a broiler chicken population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Discovery of hidden pedigree errors combining genomic information with the genomic relationship matrix in Texel sheep.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.