Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetic variations in dopamine and inhibitory control: lack of influence on action restraint.

Behavioural brain research - 1 Jul 2014

Gurvich C T, Rossell S L

Abstract excerpt

Failures of inhibitory control can severely affect everyday life in healthy individuals and represent a common feature of many neuropsychiatric conditions, particularly disorders with dopaminergic disturbances implicated. This study's aim was to examine the interacting influences of three common and functional gene variants that influence dopaminergic pathways on an aspect of inhibitory control (action...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Catechol O-Methyltransferase
Share to Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Executive Function

Share to Inhibition, Psychological

Share to Psychomotor Performance

Share to Reaction Time

Share to Receptors, Dopamine D2

Share to Task Performance and Analysis

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24657591
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.015

Genes

DRD2
COMT

Variants

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetic variations in dopamine and inhibitory control: lack of influence on action restraint.PMID 24657591Read ↗

Association of COMT and SLC6A3 polymorphisms with impulsivity, response inhibition and brain function.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of DRD4 and DAT polymorphisms and behavioral inhibition in healthy adults: implications for impulsivity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dopamine transporter genotype predicts behavioural and neural measures of response inhibition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Both the COMT Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism and sex-dependent differences influence response inhibitionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Hierarchical investigation of genetic influences on response inhibition in healthy young adults.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic markers of striatal dopamine predict individual differences in dysfunctional, but not functional impulsivity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The influence of the dopaminergic system on cognitive functioning: A molecular genetic approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genetic impact (C957T-DRD2) on inhibitory control is magnified by aging.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Motor impulsivity in Parkinson disease: associations with COMT and DRD2 polymorphisms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase and dopamine D4 receptor genotypes on neurophysiological markers of performance monitoring.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dopamine and cognitive control: sex-by-genotype interactions influence the capacity to switch attention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Influence of SLC6A3 and COMT variation on neural activation during response inhibition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.