Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.

Genetics - 1 Dec 2013

Vitezica Zulma G, Varona Luis, Legarra Andres

Abstract excerpt

Genomic evaluation models can fit additive and dominant SNP effects. Under quantitative genetics theory, additive or "breeding" values of individuals are generated by substitution effects, which involve both "biological" additive and dominant effects of the markers. Dominance deviations include only a portion of the biological dominant effects of the markers. Additive variance includes variation due to the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Analysis of Variance
Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genes, Dominant

Share to Genome

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 24121775
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.155176
PMCID: PMC3832268

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.PMID 24121775Read ↗

Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative genetics model as the unifying model for defining genomic relationship and inbreeding coefficient.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Including dominance effects in the prediction model through locus-specific weights on heterozygous genotypes can greatly improve genomic predictive abilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

GVCBLUP: a computer package for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.