Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie - 1 Dec 2017

Moghaddar N, van der Werf J H J

Abstract excerpt

The objectives of this study were to estimate the additive and dominance variance component of several weight and ultrasound scanned body composition traits in purebred and combined cross-bred sheep populations based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker genotypes and then to investigate the effect of fitting additive and dominance effects on accuracy of genomic evaluation. Additive and dominance...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Body Composition
Share to Body Weight

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Breeding

Share to Genes, Dominant

Share to Genome

Share to Metagenomics

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 28833716
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12287

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.PMID 28833716Read ↗

Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Including dominance effects in the prediction model through locus-specific weights on heterozygous genotypes can greatly improve genomic predictive abilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.