Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.

Journal of animal science - 1 Aug 2013

Cleveland M A, Hickey J M

Abstract excerpt

Genomic selection can be implemented in pig breeding at a reduced cost using genotype imputation. Accuracy of imputation and the impact on resulting genomic breeding values (gEBV) was investigated. High-density genotype data was available for 4,763 animals from a single pig line. Three low-density genotype panels were constructed with SNP densities of 450 (L450), 3,071 (L3k) and 5,963 (L6k). Accuracy of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Agriculture
Share to Breeding
Share to Cost-Benefit Analysis

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23736050
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6270

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.PMID 23736050Read ↗

Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using pre-selected variants from large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prioritizing animals for dense genotyping in order to impute missing genotypes of sparsely genotyped animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation strategies for low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data and their effects on genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Novel methods for genotype imputation to whole-genome sequence and a simple linear model to predict imputation accuracy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.