Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Dissociating markers of senescence and protective ability in memory T cells.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2012

Prlic Martin, Sacks Jilian A, Bevan Michael J

Abstract excerpt

No unique transcription factor or biomarker has been identified to reliably distinguish effector from memory T cells. Instead a set of surface markers including IL-7Rα and KLRG1 is commonly used to predict the potential of CD8 effector T cells to differentiate into memory cells. Similarly, these...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Immunologic Memory
Share to Cellular Senescence
Share to Granzymes

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Hyaluronan Receptors

Share to Lectins, C-Type

Share to Receptors, Immunologic

Share to Receptors, Interleukin-7

Share to Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22396780
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032576
PMCID: PMC3292574

Genes

KLRG1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-22396780-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Dissociating markers of senescence and protective ability in memory T cells.PMID 22396780Read ↗

Protecting and rescuing the effectors: roles of differentiation and survival in the control of memory T cell developmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Striking a Balance—Cellular and Molecular Drivers of Memory T Cell Development and Responses to Chronic StimulationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Are immunosenescent T cells really senescent?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Senescent CD8 T Effector Memory Cells are Functionally Impaired, Enriched in Aging and Disease, and a Barrier to ImmunotherapySemantic proximity Read ↗

Delineation of a molecularly distinct terminally differentiated memory CD8 T cell populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

From “truly naïve” to “exhausted senescent” T cells: When markers predict functionalitySemantic proximity Read ↗

IL-21 and IFN-alpha have both opposite and redundant role on human innate precursors and memory B-cell differentiationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Age-Related Decline in Primary CD8+ T Cell Responses Is Associated with the Development of Senescence in Virtual Memory CD8+ T Cells.Semantic proximity Read ↗

FOXO1 constrains activation and regulates senescence in CD8 T cellsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Aging Of Antiviral CD8 <sup>+</sup> Memory T Cells Fosters Increased Survival, Metabolic Adaptations And Lymphoid Tissue HomingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD4+ T Cells in Healthy Carriers Are Continuously Driven to Replicative ExhaustionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Characterisation of distinct senescent-like T cell populations during healthy and unhealthy ageingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.