Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research.

Accountability in research - 1 May 2011

Prainsack Barbara

Abstract excerpt

While the availability of genome tests on the internet has given rise to heated debates about the likely impact on personal genome information on test-takers, on insurance, and on healthcare systems, in this article I argue that a more tangible effect of personal genomics is that it has started t...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attitude to Health
Share to Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Share to Forecasting

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Privacy

Share to Genome, Human

Share to Government Regulation

Share to Internet

Share to United Kingdom

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21574070
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575032

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-21574070-2026-09-04.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-04.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research.PMID 21574070Read ↗

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disentangling Public Participation In Science and BiomedicineSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genes on the Web--direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Eyes Wide Open: The Personal Genome Project, Citizen Science and Veracity in Informed ConsentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Harvard Personal Genome Project: lessons from participatory public researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Keeping data alive: talking DTC genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Framework for Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Genetics and Genomics ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of African Americans Toward Return of Results From Exome and Whole Genome SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacySemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes towards Personal Genomics and Sharing of Genetic Data among Older Swiss Adults: A Qualitative StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.