Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Monitoring antisaccades: inter-individual differences in cognitive control and the influence of COMT and DRD4 genotype variations.

Experimental brain research - 1 Jun 2010

Kattoulas Emmanouil, Evdokimidis Ioannis, Stefanis Nicholas C, Avramopoulos Dimitrios, Stefanis Costas N, Smyrnis Nikolaos

Abstract excerpt

Conscious monitoring of behavior is an essential control function for adaptation and learning. Antisaccade performance was investigated in a large sample of young healthy men in two tasks, one that required conscious error monitoring and one that did not. Conscious error monitoring did not lead to changes in error rate between the two tasks, while other antisaccade parameters were significantly modulated....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attention
Share to Catechol O-Methyltransferase

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Executive Function

Share to Photic Stimulation

Share to Reaction Time

Share to Receptors, Dopamine D4

Share to Saccades

Share to Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 20419368
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2250-2

Genes

COMT
DRD4

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Monitoring antisaccades: inter-individual differences in cognitive control and the influence of COMT and DRD4 genotype variations.PMID 20419368Read ↗

The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase and dopamine D4 receptor genotypes on neurophysiological markers of performance monitoring.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Test-Retest Reliability and Repeatability of Behavioral and Electrophysiological Markers in an Eriksen Flanker TaskSemantic proximity Read ↗

Functional 5-HT1a receptor polymorphism selectively modulates error-specific subprocesses of performance monitoring.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Both the COMT Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism and sex-dependent differences influence response inhibitionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Measurement of the response inhibition network in a brief battery of tasks: Introducing an assessment of reactive and proactive inhibition processes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding the Error in Psychopathology: Notable Intraindividual Differences in Neural Variability of Performance MonitoringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of COMT Val158Met polymorphism on the Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs Version: tuning rather than improving performance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Brain predictive coding processes are associated to COMT gene Val158Met polymorphism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) val158met genotype is associated with BOLD response as a function of task characteristic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

COMT and GAD1 gene polymorphisms are associated with impaired antisaccade task performance in schizophrenic patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association of COMT and SLC6A3 polymorphisms with impulsivity, response inhibition and brain function.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Heritability and molecular genetic basis of antisaccade eye tracking error rate: a genome-wide association study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.