Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

RNA (E6 and E7) assays versus DNA (E6 and E7) assays for risk evaluation for women infected with human papillomavirus.

Journal of clinical microbiology - 1 Jul 2009

Cattani Paola, Siddu Alessia, D'Onghia Sara, Marchetti Simona, Santangelo Rosaria, Vellone Valerio G, Zannoni Gian Franco, Fadda Giovanni

Abstract excerpt

In the majority of cases, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) infections regress spontaneously, with only a small percentage progressing to high-grade lesions. Current screening methods are based on DNA detection. An alternative would be to monitor expression of the E6 and E7 viral oncogenes continuously expressed by malignant phenotypes. In the work reported in this paper, we compared the two methods for a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA, Viral
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Nucleic Acid Hybridization

Share to Papillomaviridae

Share to Papillomavirus Infections

Share to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Share to RNA, Messenger

Share to RNA, Viral

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 19403762
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01733-08
PMCID: PMC2708475

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

RNA (E6 and E7) assays versus DNA (E6 and E7) assays for risk evaluation for women infected with human papillomavirus.PMID 19403762Read ↗

Clinical Performance of Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 mRNA Testing for High-Grade Lesions of the CervixSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogene expression as cervical disease biomarkerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of oncogenic HPV type-specific viral DNA load and E6/E7 mRNA detection in cervical samples: results from a multicenter study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogene transcripts as biomarkers for the early detection of cervical cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Expression of E6/E7 mRNA from ‘high risk’ human papillomavirus in relation to CIN grade, viral load and p16INK4aSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of high‐risk human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncogene transcripts in cervical scrapes by nested RT‐polymerase chain reactionSemantic proximity Read ↗

HPV E6/E7 mRNA versus HPV DNA biomarker in cervical cancer screening of a group of Macedonian womenSemantic proximity Read ↗

HPV E6 and E7 mRNA Test for the Detection of High-Grade Cervical LesionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the detection of HPV-16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 by type-specific DNA- and E6/E7 mRNA-based assays of HPV DNA positive women with abnormal Pap smearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotype determination and E6/E7 mRNA detection for management of HPV positive women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Type‐specific human papillomavirus oncogene messenger RNA levels correlate with the severity of cervical neoplasiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of human papillomavirus genotype-specific DNA and E6/E7 mRNA detection to identify anal precancer among HIV-infected men who have sex with men.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.