Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Evaluation of Different Techniques for Identification of Human Papillomavirus Types of Low Prevalence

5 Mar 2008

Abstract excerpt

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have been recognized as etiologic factors in a variety of diseases. Due to the large number of HPV types, methods for HPV genotyping are difficult to standardize. Despite this fact, several methods exist, and some of them are available commercially. In this study, we evaluated the Roche Diagnostics linear array (LA) HPV genotyping assay, the Innogenetics INNO-LiPA (line probe assay...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Share to Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18322064
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02328-07

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 24 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Evaluation of Different Techniques for Identification of Human Papillomavirus Types of Low PrevalencePMID 18322064Read ↗

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by real-time multiplex PCR assay using type-specific primers and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping using commercial assays based on PCR and reverse hybridization methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the performance of different HPV genotyping methods for detecting genital HPV types.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by GP5+/6+-PCR-based reverse dot blot hybridization assay and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping test and the roche linear array HPV genotyping test.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High risk human papillomavirus genotyping in clinical samples: evaluation of different commercial tests.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection and typing of human papillomaviruses combining different methods: polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphism, line probe assay and sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Highly Sensitive PCR-Reverse Hybridization Line Probe Assay for Detection and Identification of Anogenital Human PapillomavirusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Intra-laboratory reproducibility of human papillomavirus identification in cervical specimens by a polymerase chain reaction-based assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of the TypeSeq Assay for Detection of 51 Human Papillomavirus Genotypes by Next-Generation SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotypes in high grade cervical lesions and invasive cervical carcinoma as detected by two commercial DNA assays, North Carolina, 2001-2006.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.