Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.

Community genetics - 1 Jan 2007

Treloar Susan A, Morley Katherine I, Taylor Sandra D, Hall Wayne D

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: This exploratory, pilot study aimed to investigate motivations and reflections of participants who had provided epidemiological information, blood samples and access to clinical records and data in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis, a common multifactorial disorder affecting women. We also aimed to explore understanding of complex genetic or multifactorial conditions in general....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Attitude to Health
Share to Australia

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Endometriosis

Share to Epidemiologic Studies

Share to Interviews as Topic

Share to Motivation

Share to Patient Participation

Share to Pilot Projects

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17380055
DOI: 10.1159/000099083

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.PMID 17380055Read ↗

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“I’ve never been asked”: Community perspectives on involvement in genomics researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the nutrition-related healthcare experiences of individuals with endometriosis: qualitative interviews with consumers and dietitiansSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid Ethical Appraisal: A tool to design a contextualized consent process for a genetic study of podoconiosis in EthiopiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Myths and factors...about endometriosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

‘My Devil Womb’: Patients’ perspectives on, and understanding of, endometriosis: An observational cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

"For all my family's sake, I should go and find out": an Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding Women With Endometriosis and Their Treatment Expectations: Baseline Results of a Clinical Cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid Ethical Appraisal: A tool to design a contextualized consent process for a genetic study of podoconiosis in EthiopiaSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.