Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research

16 Jan 2015

Abstract excerpt

Whole exome/ genome sequencing (WES/WGS) is now commonly used in research and is increasingly used in clinical care to identify the genetic basis of rare and unknown diseases. The management of incidental findings (IFs) generated through these analyses is debated within the research community. To examine how views regarding genomic research IFs are associated with researcher characteristics and experiences, we...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25592144
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9817-1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic ResearchPMID 25592144Read ↗

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New NormalSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of African Americans Toward Return of Results From Exome and Whole Genome SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics Researchers: Practices, Attitudes, and KnowledgeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contextsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: The emerging issue of incidental findingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratoriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.