Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.

Journal of applied microbiology - 1 Feb 2007

Scupham A J, Jones J A, Wesley I V

Abstract excerpt

AIM: As a prelude to long-term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cecum
Share to DNA, Bacterial
Share to DNA, Fungal

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Food Microbiology

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Share to Turkeys

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17241345
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03094.x

Genes

IMPACT

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.PMID 17241345Read ↗

Turkey fecal microbial community structure and functional gene diversity revealed by 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic sequences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of the upper respiratory tract microbiome of turkeysSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extractionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of tissue sample processing methods for harvesting the viral metagenome and a snapshot of the RNA viral community in a turkey gutSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence and distribution of Arcobacter species in various sources in Turkey and molecular analysis of isolated strains by ERIC-PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct PCR offers a fast and reliable alternative to conventional DNA isolation methods for animal gut microbiomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of seven methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal and cecal samples of miceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of the genetic diversity among arcobacters isolated from poultry products by using two PCR-based typing methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison and utilization of repetitive-element PCR techniques for typing Lactobacillus isolates from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.Semantic proximity Read ↗

16S-ARDRA and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as tools for identification of Lactobacillus bacteria isolated from poultry.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.