Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.

Transfusion - 1 May 2005

Lai Marco, Mavilia Gerarda, d'Onofrio Giuseppe, Leone Giuseppe

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Microplate agglutination methods (MAMs) and column agglutination technology are widely employed for red cell typing and can be automated. Some tests, however, such as detection of weak D, require manual testing. The possibility of detecting weak D by a solid-phase RBC adherence (SPRCA) test was studied in a fully automated system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The results of 2609 blood samples,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Blood Grouping and Crossmatching
Share to Epitopes
Share to Erythrocytes

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Hemagglutination Tests

Share to Phenotype

Share to Rh-Hr Blood-Group System

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15847655
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04250.x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Detection of weak D with a fully automated solid-phase red cell adherence system.PMID 15847655Read ↗

Weak D phenotypes and transfusion safety: where do we stand in daily practice?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the serological underrecognition of patients with weak or partial RHD variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Novel weak D types 31 and 32: adsorption-elution-supported D antigen analysis and comparison to prevalent weak D types.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identifying D-positive donors using a second automated testing platform.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Molecular serological characteristics of weak D antigen types of the Rhesus system].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anti-A and anti-A,B monoclonal antisera with high titers favor the detection of A weak phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic RHD genotyping in Brazilians reveals a high frequency of partial D in transfused patients serologically typed as weak D.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Weak D Testing is not Required for D- Patients With C-E- Phenotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Standardization of a multiplex assay to identify weak D types in a mixed-race Brazilian population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.