Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking.

Journal of water and health - 1 Dec 2003

Field Katharine G, Chern Eunice C, Dick Linda K, Fuhrman Jed, Griffith John, Holden Patricia A, LaMontagne Michael G, Le Joann, Olson Betty, Simonich Michael T

Abstract excerpt

Culture-independent fecal source tracking methods have many potential advantages over library-dependent, isolate-culture methods, but they have been subjected to limited testing. The purpose of this study was to compare culture-independent, library-independent methods of fecal source tracking. Five laboratories analysed identical sets of aqueous samples that contained one or more of the following sources: sewage,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Birds
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to DNA Primers

Share to Escherichia coli

Share to Microbiological Techniques

Share to Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15382723

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking.PMID 15382723Read ↗

Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic GroupsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source trackingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human wasteSemantic proximity Read ↗

Development and evaluation of a culture-independent method for source determination of fecal wastes in surface and storm waters using reverse transcriptase-PCR detection of FRNA coliphage genogroup gene sequences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Use of viral pathogens and indicators to differentiate between human and non-human fecal contamination in a microbial source tracking comparison study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.