Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.

Journal of water and health - 1 Dec 2003

Myoda Samuel P, Carson C Andrew, Fuhrmann Jeffry J, Hahm Byoung-Kwon, Hartel Peter G, Yampara-Lquise Helen, Johnson LeeAnn, Kuntz Robin L, Nakatsu Cindy H, Sadowsky Michael J, Samadpour Mansour

Abstract excerpt

Microbial source tracking (MST) results, obtained using identical sample sets and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) and ribotyping techniques were compared. These methods were performed by six investigators in analysis of duplicate, blind sets of water samples spiked with feces from five possible sources (sewage, human, dog, cow and seagull). Investigators were provided...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Birds
Share to Dogs

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field

Share to Enterococcus

Share to False Positive Reactions

Share to United States

Share to Water Microbiology

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15382722

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database.PMID 15382722Read ↗

Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of seven protocols to identify fecal contamination sources using Escherichia coli.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial source tracking using metagenomics and other new technologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A comparative study of culture-independent, library-independent genotypic methods of fecal source tracking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic characterization of Escherichia coli populations from host sources of fecal pollution by using DNA fingerprinting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Advancing source tracking: systematic review and source-specific genome database curation of fecally shed prokaryotesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Microbial Source Tracking in the Love Creek Watershed, Delaware (USA)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Host Specificity and Sensitivity of Established and Novel Sewage-Associated Marker Genes in Human and Nonhuman Fecal SamplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.